The former model usually comes off as the evil-doer in her split from Paul McCartney. But a new song from the ex-Beatle shows he has some claws, too. In “Nothing Too Much, Just Out of Sight,” Paul berates his ex with lyrics like, “I remember you well . . . I couldn’t resist you / when I made you” and he concludes with, “You have money and no manners.” McCartney’s rant comes just two weeks after Mills received a Congressional Certificate of Merit for her work in The Bronx, where she donated $1 million of healthy food to the Hunts Point Alliance.

(source)

 

Paul McCartney and Yoko Ono



 

Paul McCartney can now add one more honor to the numerous awards, accolades and the knighthood he has already received. The ex-Beatle on Monday was awarded an honorary Doctor of Music degree from Yale University.

In granting the honorary degree to McCartney – Sir Paul McCartney since he was knighted in 1996 – the university said no one compares with the legendary songwriter.

Yale said the 65-year-old McCartney awakened a generation, giving a fresh sound to rock, roll, rhythm and blues.

Yale also conferred honorary degrees on former U.S. Trade Representative Carla Hills, astronomer Martin Rees, architect Cesar Pelli, poet John Lawrence Ashbery and others.

 

PAUL McCartney will never escape Heather Mills. The former nudie model wants a house in every city where McCartney owns one, reports Britain’s Sun. “She’s determined to carry on living the privileged life she had with Paul,” the paper says. “Wherever Paul is, she wants to be there for daughter Beatrice. And Bea should have the same life with her as with Paul. Heather says that she wants the country house, one in London, one in New York, one in LA, even one in the Hamptons.” Meanwhile, Mills has angered a former schoolmate in England, who told Page Six she’s “just one of many victims she has left along the way.” Fiona McAndrew says Mills wrote a newspaper story in 1994 that blasted McAndrew for getting breast implants for free on the National Health Service while a boy with cancer waited 10 months for bone implant surgery. McAndrew says she was “shunned in the street” after the story ran. She recently wrote to Mills, “I wonder if now you know how it feels to be publicly flogged . . . I remember you from school, that little girl who stood telling us how you had to go to London as your father was going to prison. To think I actually felt sorry for you!”

 

Heather Mills is intensifying her bitter war with her husband’s divorce lawyer Fiona Shackleton.

Having thrown a jug of water over Mrs Shackleton at the High Court yesterday, Miss Mills is now threatening to report her to the Law Society for professional misconduct over allegations that she called her names.

Miss Mills threw water over her former husband’s lawyer and then laughingly announced that she had been “baptised in court.” (Check out the before and after above)

But Mrs Shackleton may well have the last laugh as she is rumoured to have earned £3million from the McCartney case.

Miss Mills’ water-throwing tantrum was followed by an astonishing 12-minute rant on the court steps.

She accused Mrs Shackleton, nicknamed the “Steel Magnolia”, of “calling me many, many names before even meeting me when I was in a wheelchair”.

According to sources, Miss Mills is planning to report Mrs Shackleton to the Law Society, the body that regulates solicitors, over alleged comments made during negotiations leading up to yesterday’s settlement.

A source said: “Mills believes that Shackleton accused her of trying it on by appearing at one legal meeting in a wheelchair to gain sympathy.

“More than anyone else, Mills felt this woman had a personal grudge against her. She felt personally attacked by Fiona Shackleton.”

Mrs Shackleton, her reputation now secured as perhaps the finest and certainly most feared divorce lawyer in the country, could for her part take the fight to Mrs Mills.

The source said: “If Fiona Shackleton wants to, she could press for Heather Mills to be found in contempt of court.”

Mrs Shackleton, who also represented Prince Charles in his divorce, has refused to comment, pointing out it is her policy never to speak to the media.

Miss Mills’ outburst came after she was awarded only a fifth of the £125million she had been seeking.

The £25million settlement amounts to more than £700 for every hour that she was married to Sir Paul.

But she was furious at the judge’s decision to grant his request that the full judgment in the case be made public, and today lost her appeal against the move.

Miss Mills is understood to have hurled a glass of water at Sir Paul’s lawyer after accusing her of “letting down womankind” by representing men in the divorce courts.

Mrs Shackleton, whose normally immaculate blonde coiffure was wet and bedraggled, left the Royal Courts of Justice through a rear exit with Sir Paul.

He said simply: “I have no comment. All will be revealed.”

By this time Miss Mills was on the front steps delivering an angry tirade against her ex, his lawyers, her lawyers and the entire legal system.

She confirmed that she had been awarded £24.3million compared with the £125million which court papers revealed she had demanded.

The amount is made up of a £14million lump sum, calculated as an annual allowance of £600,000, plus another £2.5million to buy a London home.

The rest comprises assets she will keep from the marriage totalled at £7.8million, which include a property in East Sussex where she lives with their four-year-old daughter Beatrice.

In addition, she will receive £35,000 a year for Beatrice’s expenses until she reaches 18. That figure does not include childcare or schooling, which Sir Paul will also fund.

Miss Mills’s chances of gaining £125million collapsed after the judge ruled that the musician was worth £400million rather than the £800million she had claimed.

It was also reduced after Sir Paul’s legal team argued successfully that they did not live together before they married.

McCartney’s lawyers turned out to be worth their weight in gold.

They advised him to take a gamble and back out of a £50million mutually-agreed settlement on the basis that they thought a High Court judge would award a lot less. It was advice which saved him some £25million.

In her impromptu press conference, Miss Mills criticised the ruling that Sir Paul was worth £400million, saying: “We all know he’s worth £800million.

“He’s been worth £800million for the last 15 years.”

She then criticised the judge for believing that they never lived together before they married, citing electoral roll evidence to the contrary.

Normally in cases at the Family Court, matters remain private but Sir Paul is said to be keen to end the speculation over his finances and wants the details out in the open.

However Miss Mills argues that it will put her and their daughter’s security at risk by revealing where she will go to school.

In a barbed remark, she said her ex-husband wanted the details published because “he wants to look like this generous Sir Paul.”

Today, in the Court of Appeal, a panel of three judges will decide whether to uphold yesterday’s decision to publish the full ruling.

The court also made an order yesterday stating that, save for the release of the judgment, neither party could reveal details of the case without obtaining the consent of the other.

Family law expert Donna Dean said Miss Mills had already shown “scant regard” for this order.

“Her comments outside court could land her in hot water. If she has breached this order then she could be in contempt and hauled back before the judge to explain herself.

“It would have been much more sensible and dignified for her to have kept quiet and walked away content with her lot.”

Last night, Miss Mills removed all references to her ex-husband from her website and changed her name on it from Heather Mills McCartney to Heather Mills.

A close friend said that in private she was devastated about being awarded so little. “In court it is clear that she just got too cocky.

“The worst thing she could have done was represent herself. On quite a few occasions, Heather was just too brusque with the judge and would talk over him.

High Court judges don’t take kindly to being ranted at. Heather just came across as incredibly greedy.”

(source)

 

She was less than four minutes into the rant when everyone started to pray for another gagging order.

Surely Heather Mills couldn’t drag out much longer a simple statement to convey her joy that the case was over and that she was more than £24million richer?

Oh yes she could. She was centre stage now and she wasn’t going to let the moment pass.

In a remarkable performance on the steps of the High Court, she gave a triumphant wave for the cameras – and delivered her account of the settlement with barely concealed venom for the way it had come about.

It brought to a close the secretive and acrimonious wrangling over their broken marriage and Heather’s financial future.

Or rather it would have done, had not the 40-year-old ex-model announced her determination to appeal today against the judge’s decision to make details of the case public.

So her obvious anger was directed mostly at that, and not at the amount of money she managed to cream from the Macca fortune for herself and their daughter Beatrice.

But good grief, it took her long enough to say it.

Across the marble floor of the High Court came the Fab One, down the front steps with a catwalk wiggle and a flick of her hair.

She wore a blood-red blouse and a satisfied smile. She was pleased the case was over and she had secured “an incredible result”. But she was clearly furious at the way details of the judgement were being released.

Poor old Heather. Here she was with a mere £24million settlement, probably enough to buy only a few streets in her native Tyne and Wear.

Who could blame the girl if she felt bitter? But no. She was “very, very happy” with the financial settlement, she told us – even though it emerged that she had sought nearly £125million, and that her former husband had offered £15.8million.

From the Heather Mills manual of marriage guidance came this advice: couples should always do their best to resolve their problems instantly.

“Anybody wanting to go through a divorce, try your hardest, man or woman, to settle it immediately.

“And if you’re in an impossible situation – which anybody listening will know that, people don’t see eye to eye, things get out of hand – you can be a litigant in person.”

“The power of one” was how she described it. She labelled herself as “a campaigning girl” and urged others not to be frightened to represent themselves in court, even though, she insisted, the legal system didn’t approve of it.

Two years preparing for this day had made her impressively fluent in legal-speak (albeit with a Geordie twang that made the word “litigant” delightfully difficult to distinguish).

On and on she went. On the TV screens, only reporters and policemen could be seen in the background.

It made it look at first as if she was alone, a fitting image for her unrepresented battle against the McCartney might and millions.

In fact she was there with her sister Fiona – whom she introduced as a tireless supporter of her crusade – plus a minder and that essential chaperone for anyone contemplating a similar court battle, her personal trainer.

It was Fiona, at her side, who prompted her from time to time when Heather appeared to leave out some of the tastier titbits from the settlement.

The judge had found no evidence that McCartney was worth more than £400million, for example, even though “everyone knows” he’s been worth twice that for the last 15 years, Heather asserted.

The payout? That would be used to secure her own and her daughter’s future, she said.

She also planned to “make a difference” with some of the charities she supported. It took her only 33 words before she mentioned that.

Later she suggested the £600,000 she saved in legal fees might easily have gone to charity, although she didn’t specify one.

Particular poison was reserved for Sir Paul’s lawyer, Fiona Shackleton. Miss Mills spoke her name with the same kind of disgust that an estranged wife normally reserves for the other woman.

“Fiona Shackleton has very sadly handled this in the worst manner you could ever, ever imagine. She has called me many, many names before even meeting me when I was in a wheelchair.”

Of course, the world would never have heard any of this had the judgement remained private.

“I wouldn’t even be standing here,” Heather insisted, because there was a gagging order on her not to reveal marital confidences.

Well all right then. Maybe just a little one from post-separation days. “I wasn’t allowed to look at what we spent,” Heather told us.

“I was locked out of every home. I won’t go into all the horrific details of what has happened because I’m just glad it’s over.”

And so was everyone else. She had already delivered something approaching 2,000 words.

More is to follow. Today she begins her battle to suppress the court ruling, or at least try to keep some of the personal detail out of the public domain. And after that?

“I really hope now that me and my daughter can have a life and not be followed every single day. That’s why I’ve come out – to give it closure.”

Somehow, you got the feeling the Heather Mills story might not be closed quite yet.

(source)

 


Order a FREE ‘Vegetarian Starter Kit’ at GoVeg.com.

One issue Paul McCartney and his estranged ex Heather Mills aren’t feuding over: animal rights.

McCartney, 65, is lending his face to PETA’s new “I Am a Vegetarian” ad campaign.

“If anyone wants to save the planet, all they have to do is just stop eating meat,” McCartney tells Us. “That’s the single most important thing you could do.

“It’s staggering when you think about it,” he adds. “Vegetarianism takes care of so many things in one shot: ecology, famine, cruelty.”

In his ad for PETA (an organization he endorsed with his ex, Mills, 40), McCartney declares:

“Many years ago, I was fishing, and as I was reeling in the poor fish, I realized, ‘I am killing him – all for the passing pleasure it brings me.’

“Something inside me clicked. I realized as I watched him fight for breath that his life was as important to him as mine is to me.

“I am Paul McCartney, and I am a vegetarian.”

PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) is also publishing the vegetarian testimonials of Pam Anderson, Forest Whitaker, Casey Affleck and Alicia Silverstone.

“Whether it’s for animals, the environment or health reasons, stars’ reasons for keeping animals off their plates are as diverse and inspiring as their talents,” PETA managing director Ingrid Newkirk tells Us.

For more information, visit veggietestimonial.peta.org.

 

Paul McCartney and Heather Mills’ weeklong divorce hearing ended Monday without a deal, and a judge will now impose a settlement on the warring couple.

As legal teams left court, McCartney’s lawyer Nicholas Mostyn told reporters that judge Hugh Bennett had reserved his ruling. The judge will now spend several weeks working out a settlement.

Mills and McCartney separated in 2006 after four years of marriage. They went to court to decide on Mills’ share of the former Beatle’s fortune, which is estimated at as much as $1.6 billion.

Mills, 40, smiled as she left London’s Royal Courts of Justice with her entourage. McCartney, 65, did not attend, although he was in court to face his estranged wife every day last week.

Media reports have suggested McCartney offered his wife around S$50 million and that she was seeking at least double that amount.

Few details have emerged from Court 34 since the hearing began Feb. 11. Unlike most British court cases, divorce proceedings are heard in private, and the courtroom is closed to journalists and the public.

The terms of a settlement will not become public unless it is challenged in the Court of Appeal, or one of the parties chooses to reveal details.

Mills is a former model whose left leg was amputated below the knee after a motorcycle accident in 1993. She became active in campaigning against land mines and in favor of animal welfare.

The couple married in June 2002 – four years after the death of McCartney’s first wife, Linda – and their daughter Beatrice was born in October the following year. They announced their separation in 2006, and McCartney filed for divorce alleging “unreasonable behavior” by his wife.

 

Heather Mills will be barred from grilling Sir Paul McCartney in court over his alleged violent behaviour towards her during their four-year marriage.

She arrived looking upbeat in a black velvet pinstriped suit and bright red shirt, despite the ban, which could have an adverse affect on her case.

Ms Mills, who is representing herself, is expected to begin cross-examining her estranged husband today in a legal battle to decide the size of her divorce payout.

But Mr Justice Bennett, the High Court judge who will decide the size of Ms Mills’s divorce settlement, is expected to rule that claims of violence are irrelevant in determining how much money Sir Paul should pay his ex-wife.

In divorce papers leaked last year, Ms Mills, 40, accused Sir Paul, 65, of being violent towards her on four occasions, including being stabbed in the arm with a broken wine glass. The former Beatle denied the allegations.

A legal source said today: “The court does not like to air dirty linen in public. What people have done wrong in a marriage is not going to weigh on a judge’s mind in deciding the size of a payout.”

The case was due to conclude today but Mr Justice Bennett is understood to have made space available in his court diary allowing it to run into next week.

(source)



© 2011 Celebrity Mound Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha